California’s End of Life Option Act (EOLOA)
Overview
When the End of Life Option Act was signed by Governor Jerry Brown, and went into effect on June 9, 2016, it laid a solid foundation for all Californians to be supported in their end of life wishes. It represents a major step forward in the nationwide effort to change state laws to better reflect humane values. The new law was patterned after the country’s first ground-breaking law, Oregon’s Death with Dignity Act, in effect since 1997. With the new law, California became the 7th and the largest state in the country to allow licensed physicians to legally prescribe a lethal dose of medication to decisionally-capable, terminally ill patients, 18 years or older, thoughtfully requesting medical aid-in-dying.
Statute
Annual Report
-
California End of Life Option Act 2017 Data Report (PDF)
-
California End of Life Option Act 2016 Data Report (PDF)
LEGAL UPDATE: June 15, 2018
A California appeals court has reinstated the End of Life Option Act law, ruling that it can remain in effect, at least temporarily, while opponents’ legal challenges are considered. This means that terminally-ill Californians who meet specific requirements can once again legally obtain life-ending medications while the case works its way through the courts.
Overwhelming?
If all of this seems overwhelming, know that you are not alone. Many people find accessing the law difficult. That’s why we are here to help. Our highly trained volunteers will help you and your family walk through the process from beginning to end. We can explain all legal end-of-life options available in California including the End of Life Options Act. There are other options we can discuss with you also.
Please call us at 760-636-8009 or email info@endoflifechoicesca.org to speak with a volunteer.
“In the end, I was left to reflect on what I would want in the face of my own death. I do not know what I would do if I were dying in prolonged and excruciating pain. I am certain, however, that it would be a comfort to be able to consider the options afforded by this bill. And I wouldn’t deny that right to others.”